Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 general score. The Galaxy S10 construction is newer, but noticeably thicker and a little heavier than Moto Z2 Force Edition. Galaxy S10 features a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a just a bit higher pixel amount in each inch of screen, a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a quite larger display. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has slightly more storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S10 counts with better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has better 60 fps video frame rates, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a much larger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S10 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.