Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is way better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 score. Galaxy S10 5G's design is newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is a lot heavier and incredibly thicker. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a display that's just as good as Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a little bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G shoots a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a lot larger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in low light situations.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has more storage for games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 65 percent bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.