Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| $ 800.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite design is extremely newer, but noticeably thicker and extremely heavier than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel quantity in each inch of screen.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a little bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 Lite captures much better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a F2 diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera, better video frame rate and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a really longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 65% more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.