Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is much better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a score of 86.3 against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy S10e's construction is newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is a little bit heavier and way thicker. The Galaxy S10e counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10e also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Galaxy S10e takes just a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy S10e also has a lot bigger camera aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited situations, a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality photographs and better video frame rate.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S10e, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 14 percent greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy S10e is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.