Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is way better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a 94.8 score against 77.4. Although the Galaxy S20 is a lot newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's a lot thicker and heavier. Galaxy S20 has a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a little bit better screen pixel density, a slightly higher 1440 x 3200px resolution and a little bigger display.
Galaxy S20 has a little bit better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S20 features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S20 has a superior battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2730mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a much better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a 12 megapixels back camera, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures, a way higher video definition and a bigger camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.