Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 general score. Galaxy S20 FE's construction is a lot newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it's much thicker and incredibly heavier. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixel count per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a slightly better storage capacity for apps and games than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy S20 FE has just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 FE features a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 65 percent greater battery size. Galaxy S20 FE has a better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S20 FE also has faster 60 fps video frame rate, a way larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low light captures.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S20 FE is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.