Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is way better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 global score. Although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is notably heavier and much thicker. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and Moto Z2 Force Edition both have incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better processor than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has an 83 percent bigger battery capacity. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a much larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs, a back camera with way more mega pixels, a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a lot better video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.