Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 FE is much better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting an 89.1 score against 77.4. Galaxy S21 FE's construction is newer, but noticeably thicker and somewhat heavier than Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Galaxy S21 FE counts with a little better performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S21 FE also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little sharper screen than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher screen pixels density. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE captures a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and a 12 mega-pixels back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also has higher video frame rates and a larger aperture for better low light images and video.
Galaxy S21 FE is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bit cheaper, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.