Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. Galaxy S22's design is incredibly newer, but heavier and noticeably thicker than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. Samsung Galaxy S22 has a little faster CPU than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a sharper screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite bigger display. Galaxy S22 counts with a greater camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality, a larger camera aperture, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a really longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the Moto Z2 Force Edition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.