Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a overall score of 95.4 against 77.4. The Galaxy S22 Ultra design is notably newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is incredibly thicker and extremely heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a little bit worse pixel number per inch of display, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a CPU that's just as good as the processing unit in Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although the Galaxy S22 Ultra has more RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a bigger aperture for better low-light images and video, a much better video quality, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a really longer battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh.
Galaxy S22 Ultra is way more expensive than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.