Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-10 | -- |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | -- |
| 5.04 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a general score of 82.6 against 77.4. The Galaxy S25 body is noticeably lighter and notably thinner than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy S25 features a better screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little worse display density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a much better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a way more mega-pixels camera, a larger aperture, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a way larger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 47 percent larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S25 and the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.