Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-10 | -- |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | -- |
| 5.04 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a global score of 90.7 against 77.4. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a much lighter and notably thinner cellphone than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a little lower amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a much larger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality, a larger camera aperture for better low light photos, a much better 200 MP resolution camera in the back and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.