Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 4.72 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Plus has a global score of 78.1, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 general score. Despite being the best in this comparison, it must be noted that it is also a notably older, just a little heavier and a lot thicker cellphone. Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus features a processor that is just as good as the Moto Z2 Force Edition one, because although the Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus has less cpu cores (although they are faster) and 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it has a way lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a just a bit worse pixels quantity per inch in the display and a quite smaller screen. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus features just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP and a bigger camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and 48 GB more internal storage. Galaxy S5 Plus has a little better battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 2800mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S5 Plus is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.