Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 4.72 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport is just a bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a score of 77.8 against 77.4. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy S5 Sport is a older, a little heavier and noticeably thicker cellphone than Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Galaxy S5 Sport's CPU is very similar to Moto Z2 Force Edition's processor, because although the Galaxy S5 Sport has 4 lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a little more vivid display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it has a quite smaller screen, a quite worse pixels quantity per inch in the display and a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. The Galaxy S5 Sport features a little bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures and a way more MP back-facing camera.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features just a bit longer battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3% more battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.