Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-10 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Force Edition is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with a general score of 77.4 against 75.8. The Moto Z2 Force Edition construction is newer, way lighter and extremely thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has just a bit better screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2560, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, they both have a camera with a 12 MP, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy S7 Active has a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 47 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S7 Active. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S7 Active, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.