Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-08-10 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge is a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a score of 78.1 against 77.4. Galaxy S7 edge is an older, just a little heavier and notably thicker device than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy S7 edge. They have exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560, a better amount of pixels per screen inch and a screen of the same size.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a larger number of cores.
The Galaxy S7 edge has greater battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity against 2730mAh. Galaxy S7 edge captures clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a camera with a 12 mega-pixels and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy S7 edge also has a larger sensor taking better quality videos and pictures and a larger camera aperture for better low light photography and videos.
The Galaxy S7 edge not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.