Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-10 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 has an overall score of 81.7, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 global score. Samsung Galaxy S8 is a better cellphone than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, we must tell that it is also a a bit heavier and much thicker cellphone. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a bit better performance than Galaxy S8. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy S8 has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a just a bit higher pixel density, a little larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2960. The Galaxy S8 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy S8 also has a larger aperture for better captures in poorly lited situations and a larger back camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S8, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S8 features a little longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S8 not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.