Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-10 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is a bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a general score of 83.3 against 77.4. The Galaxy S9 construction is somewhat heavier and way thicker than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. Galaxy S9 has a little bit better processing power than Moto Z2 Force Edition. They have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a little sharper screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a little higher display density, a quite better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and a bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S9 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy S9 also has better video frame rate, a way larger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S9, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features just a little better battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S9 is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.