Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 overall score. Although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is way newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's noticeably thicker and noticeably heavier. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a just a bit better pixel density. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing images or video in poorly lited situations and a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have a 12 mega pixels resolution camera, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a really longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 65 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs more money than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z2 Force Edition. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto Z2 Force Edition, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.