Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, having an 81 score against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro body is newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is a lot heavier and extremely thicker. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little bit better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixels density. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a way smaller sensor which provides a lot worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a much better 25 MP resolution back-facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 48% bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.