Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a global score of 85.6, which is much better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's score of 77.4. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a notably newer cellphone than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it is noticeably heavier and thicker. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a little higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit superior processor than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with greater battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 21% larger battery capacity. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a smaller camera aperture, they both have a same resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.