Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| $ 800.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a global score of 92.3 against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is incredibly newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger diafragm aperture and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has greater battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.