Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's global score of 77.4. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is notably heavier and thicker. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller display and a little lower 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a greater display pixel density.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same resolution back camera, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has better video frame rate, a lot larger sensor taking lot higher quality photos and videos and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.