Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a 90.6 score against 77.4. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is a little bit thicker and much heavier. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little faster processor than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit worse 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a larger aperture.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.