Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a score of 77.4, which is a little bit better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 general score. Despite of the fact that Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is much older than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, it's body is a lot lighter and extremely thinner. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little sharper display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better screen pixels density.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit more powerful processor than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The TCL 20 Pro 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a back-facing camera with way more MP, a lot bigger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much bigger storage for apps and games than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 65 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.