Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a score of 86.6 against 77.4. Xiaomi Black Shark 3's design is incredibly newer, but noticeably thicker and way heavier than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4720mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a way better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has faster video frame rate, a camera in the back with much more mega pixels, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.