Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blasting black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a 90.1 score against 77.4. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro body is notably newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it is a lot thicker and much heavier. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a little lower 1440 x 2560px resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels per inch of display. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has an 83 percent larger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has higher video frame rates, a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low-light situations, a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.