Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is slightly better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, with an 81.6 score against 77.4. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a way newer cellphone than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it is a lot thicker and incredibly heavier. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's CPU is just as good as Moto Z2 Force Edition's CPU, and although the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater screen density. Moto Z2 Force Edition has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a way better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a camera with lot more MP, a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.