Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 general score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is noticeably newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is extremely thicker and way heavier. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixels amount per display inch.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro count with incredibly similar processing units, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a back camera with a much higher resolution, a lot bigger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a bigger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also a bargain compared to the other devices, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.