Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a score of 79, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 global score. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is noticeably newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's way heavier and extremely thicker. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher screen density.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a superior battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a larger aperture to take better low-light images and video, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.