Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 has a general score of 83.3, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 score. Although the iPhone 11 is much newer than the Moto Z2 Play, it's way heavier and incredibly thicker. The Apple iPhone 11 counts with a better processing power than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has lesser CPU cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone 11 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone 11 features just a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per inch of display and a little bit lower 828 x 1792 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display. Moto Z2 Play features a much better storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto Z2 Play also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The iPhone 11 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3110mAh of battery capacity. IPhone 11 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same resolution back-facing camera, the iPhone 11 also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Although iPhone 11 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z2 Play. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto Z2 Play, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.