Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a general score of 85.3, which is much better than Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 score. Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is notably newer than the Moto Z2 Play, it's way heavier and incredibly thicker. The iPhone 11 Pro Max features a more powerful CPU than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has less cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
IPhone 11 Pro Max features a sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a quite better display pixel density, a better 1242 x 2688px resolution and a larger display. The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a 12 mega-pixels camera, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 3969mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z2 Play. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Moto Z2 Play, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.