Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 14.x |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.18 x 2.53 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 4.76 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 477 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Apple A14 Bionic chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit, 5 nm (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 mini has a score of 88.5, which is much better than Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 score. The Apple iPhone 12 mini is a noticeably newer and just a little bit lighter cellphone than Moto Z2 Play, although it's somewhat thicker. The iPhone 12 mini has a quite superior processing power than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone 12 mini also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone 12 mini counts with a better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite greater screen pixels density. The iPhone 12 mini takes a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same resolution back camera, the iPhone 12 mini also has a larger aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations and faster video frame rates.
The Moto Z2 Play has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 mini, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z2 Play also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with greater battery lifetime than iPhone 12 mini, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 12 mini is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z2 Play. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Moto Z2 Play, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.