Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is much better than the Moto Z2 Play, with a global score of 92.8 against 77.4. IPhone 12 Pro's body is way newer than the Moto Z2 Play's, but it is thicker and extremely heavier. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a brighter screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a just a little better number of pixels in each inch of display, a little larger screen and a better resolution of 1170 x 2532px.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a quite superior performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64-bit processing unit. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto Z2 Play has a little better battery performance than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2815mAh. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 megapixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro also has a bigger aperture for better low light images and videos and better video frame rate.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone 12 Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Moto Z2 Play, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.