Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's overall score of 77.4. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max's design is incredibly newer, but noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a 64-bit CPU.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a better looking screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a higher 1284 x 2778px resolution, a just a bit better screen density and a larger display. Moto Z2 Play counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max takes a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same resolution camera in the back, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max also has faster video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has better battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 3687mAh battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, otherwise you can save some money and get the Moto Z2 Play, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.