Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 9.x |
| 2017-06-29 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 6s is just a bit better than Moto Z2 Play, having a score of 83 against 77.4. Apple iPhone 6s is an older and somewhat thicker phone than Moto Z2 Play, but Apple managed to make it a little bit lighter anyway. The iPhone 6s has a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, although it has a little bit smaller display, a just a little lower display pixel density and a way lower 1334 x 750 resolution.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone 6s, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Apple iPhone 6s has a little faster processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bits processing unit.
The iPhone 6s counts with a slightly better camera than Moto Z2 Play, although it has a way smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a same resolution camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Moto Z2 Play features a much better battery life than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 6s is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z2 Play. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Moto Z2 Play, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.