Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 9.x |
| 2017-06-29 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 625.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Apple A9 APL1022 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus is just a bit better than the Moto Z2 Play, with a general score of 84.2 against 77.4. Although it's the best cellphone we are comparing, Apple iPhone 6s Plus's design is older, thicker and noticeably heavier than Moto Z2 Play. The iPhone 6s Plus counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor and an extra graphics processor.
IPhone 6s Plus counts with a better screen than Moto Z2 Play. They have an equal 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, a same size screen and the same quantity of pixels in each inch in the display. The Moto Z2 Play features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
IPhone 6s Plus counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, although it has a much tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and videos in low light situations, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play has just a bit longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because it has a 3000mAh battery size instead of 2750mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 6s Plus is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Apple iPhone 6s Plus, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto Z2 Play, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.