Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2017-06-29 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 general score. Although it's the best phone we are comparing, the iPhone X body is extremely thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Apple iPhone X counts with a greater processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has less RAM memory and 2 less processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone X counts with a better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a just a bit higher pixels density, a little larger screen and a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution. Moto Z2 Play features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
IPhone X features a slightly better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have a camera with a 12 mega pixels and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the iPhone X also counts with better video frame rates.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a bit superior battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.