Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's general score of 77.4. The Google Pixel 4 body is much newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, although it is noticeably thicker and heavier. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 features a bit more vivid display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bit better pixels amount per screen inch, a bit higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little bit larger display. Google Pixel 4 takes slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4 also has a back-facing camera with a higher resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7 percent greater battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z2 Play, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.