Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than the Moto Z2 Play, with an 82.9 score against 77.4. The Google Pixel 4 XL construction is extremely newer, but way heavier and way thicker than Moto Z2 Play. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a better pixel count per inch of display, a lot higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a quite larger screen.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4 XL has better battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Google Pixel 4 XL captures slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a F1.7 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a camera with more megapixels.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4 XL, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z2 Play, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.