Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Just black |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's overall score of 77.4. The Google Pixel 4a body is notably newer and just a little lighter than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, although it's also extremely thicker. The Google Pixel 4a has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a quite greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the display and a little larger display.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4a has a little faster processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with just a bit longer battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 3140mAh battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Google Pixel 4a also has a higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola Moto Z2 Play, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.