Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is better than Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 global score. The Google Pixel 4a 5G body is much newer than Moto Z2 Play's, but it's heavier and thicker. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little larger screen and a just a little more pixels per inch of display. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little bit better camera than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a better 12.2 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Moto Z2 Play features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has greater battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.