Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 overall score. Although Google Pixel 5 is a lot newer than the Moto Z2 Play, it is just a bit heavier and much thicker. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit faster processor than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 5 features a bit better screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bit larger screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite greater count of pixels per display inch. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 5 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same video quality, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher 12.2 MP resolution camera in the back and higher video frame rate. The Google Pixel 5 features a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 36% more battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z2 Play. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Moto Z2 Play, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.