Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Metal | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 401 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has an overall score of 92.1, which is better than Moto Z2 Play's global score of 77.4. Although the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is much newer than the Moto Z2 Play, it's noticeably heavier and way thicker. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much more vibrant screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a larger screen, a just a bit higher pixels density and a better 1280 x 2800 resolution. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 960 GB more internal storage.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same video definition, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a much better resolution back camera, a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations and higher video frame rate.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much better battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z2 Play. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Moto Z2 Play, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.