Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| 2017-06-29 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play is a little bit better than the HTC U Ultra, with a 77.4 score against 77. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play body is incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter than HTC U Ultra, although they were released with only 4 months difference. The HTC U Ultra has a bit better screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a quite larger display, a greater screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a bit more powerful CPU than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has 4 more cpu cores. The HTC U Ultra has a slightly better camera than Moto Z2 Play, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have the same (4K) video definition, a back-facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
HTC U Ultra counts with as much memory for apps and games as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play one, they have the same 64 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The HTC U Ultra counts with a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery lifetime in Motorola Moto Z2 Play.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.