Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| 2017-06-29 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC U11 is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having a 77.6 score against 77.4. The HTC U11 is a better cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, we must tell that it is also a somewhat heavier and a lot thicker cellphone. The HTC U11 has a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores.
The HTC U11 counts with a little sharper screen than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the HTC U11 also has more pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Moto Z2 Play features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC U11, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z2 Play also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z2 Play and the HTC U11 both count with extremely similar battery performance. HTC U11 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Play. Both have the same resolution camera in the back, the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same camera aperture.
Although HTC U11 is a better device, it is more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z2 Play. If you want to save some money, you can get Moto Z2 Play, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.