Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-06-29 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Play is a little bit better than the LG G7 Fit, having a 77.4 score against 77. Motorola Moto Z2 Play's body is extremely thinner and just a bit lighter than LG G7 Fit, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. LG G7 Fit features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a quite bigger display and more pixels per inch of display.
Moto Z2 Play counts with more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the Moto Z2 Play also has 32 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a greater number of faster cores.
The LG G7 Fit and Motorola Moto Z2 Play count with really similar battery performance. The LG G7 Fit takes a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a much tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.