Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-06-29 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has a general score of 81, which is a little bit better than Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 general score. LG G7 ThinQ is a newer cellphone than the Moto Z2 Play, but it is way thicker and somewhat heavier. LG G7 ThinQ features a much more vibrant screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bit larger display, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG G7 ThinQ's storage capacity to store more apps and games is very similar to the Moto Z2 Play one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processor than Moto Z2 Play. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
LG G7 ThinQ captures a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same video quality, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography, a camera with a lot higher 16 megapixels resolution and better video frame rate. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a battery performance that's just as good as Motorola Moto Z2 Play's battery life.
LG G7 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.