Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a global score of 82.7, which is a bit better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 global score. The LG G8X ThinQ design is a lot newer, but incredibly heavier and thicker than Moto Z2 Play. LG G8X ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a bigger screen and a bit better number of pixels per inch of screen.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking pictures or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video resolution and a same resolution camera in the back, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with higher video frame rates.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more internal memory capacity. LG G8X ThinQ features longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG G8X ThinQ is a little more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.