Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Titan gray |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is better than Moto Z2 Play, with an 85.4 score against 77.4. LG K92 is a way newer cellphone than the Moto Z2 Play, although it is much heavier and a lot thicker. The LG K92's processor is very similar to the processing unit in Moto Z2 Play, and although the LG K92 has a larger amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG K92 and Moto Z2 Play count with similar screens, because although the LG K92 has a just a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger display. LG K92 counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has 128 GB internal memory.
The LG K92 has longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. LG K92 captures much better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG K92 also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.